Legal Opinion

Brinkley v. Monterey Fin. Servs., Inc.

California Court of Appeal, 4th District

Decided November 19, 2015No. D066059PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAaron, J.

*321I.

INTRODUCTION

Plaintiff Tiffany Brinkley appeals from an order of the trial court compelling her to arbitrate her individual claims and dismissing her class claims. Brinkley filed a putative class action against defendant Monterey Financial Services, Inc. (Monterey), asserting statutory violations arising from allegations that Monterey unlawfully recorded and/or monitored telephone conversations that Brinkley had with Monterey's representatives. Monterey moved to compel Brinkley to arbitrate her individual claims and to dismiss Brinkley's class claims, based on an arbitration agreement…

2Cases cited55 opinions

  1. Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. United Steelworkers v. Warrior & Gulf Navigation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
  3. First Options of Chicago, Inc. v. KaplanSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  4. At&T Technologies, Inc. v. Communications WorkersSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  5. Howsam v. Dean Witter Reynolds, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2002

50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Joann Wainwright v. Melaleuca, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2021
  2. Keeton v. TeslaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2024
  3. Murillo v. Santa Barbara Corp. Fitness CA2/6California Court of Appeal · 2020
  4. Murillo v. Santa Barbara Corp. Fitness CA2/6California Court of Appeal · 2020
  5. Quiroz v. World Variety Produce CA2/7California Court of Appeal · 2021

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API