Legal Opinion
Hurt v. Schneider
Supreme Court of Colorado
Decided January 15, 1916No. 8284PublishedCited by 14 opinions
Error to the Court of Appeals.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mr. Justice Teller.
The defendants in error are the heirs at law of John Schneider who brought suit to cancel a tax-deed under which the defendants claim title to a tract of land in Saguache County.
The trial court found for the defendants and dismissed the action. The Court of Appeals reversed the judgment, (25 Colo. App. 355), and the cause is now here for a review of the judgment of reversal.
There is no dispute as to the facts, and the only question .presented is one of law.
On January 16,1899, said John Schneider by an instrument in writing leased to said Hurt the land in…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Jackson v. KingSupreme Court of Alabama · 1886
- Bailey's Adm'r v. CampbellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1886
- Petty v. MaysSupreme Court of Florida · 1883
- Thrall v. Omaha Hotel Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1877
- Dempsey v. . KippNew York Court of Appeals · 1875
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Koch v. Kiron State BankSupreme Court of Iowa · 1941
- Hadlock v. Benjamin Drainage Dist.Utah Supreme Court · 1936
- Whatley v. WoodSupreme Court of Colorado · 1961
- Clay v. SandalAlaska Supreme Court · 1962
- White v. WidgerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1960
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.