Legal Opinion
Fruco Const. Co. v. McClelland
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided December 3, 1951No. 14286PublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
THOMAS, Circuit Judge.
In December, 1940, the appellant, Fruco Construction Company, entered into a cost-plus-fixed-fee contract with the United States to construct the numerous buildings, roadways, sidewalks and other structures at St. Louis, Missouri, known as the St. Louis Ordnance Plant or the Small Arms Ammunition Plant.
The appellees, plaintiffs in the trial court, who were employed at the plant as construction guards, brought this action against the appellant under the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938, 29 U.S.C.A. §§ 201 to 219, to recover for the period between October 13, 1941, and…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- A. B. Kirschbaum Co. v. WallingSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Posadas v. National City BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Bartels v. BirminghamSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Cosmopolitan Shipping Co. v. McAllisterSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Standard Oil Co. of Cal. v. JohnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Gulf King Shrimp Company v. W. Willard Wirtz, Secretary of Labor, United States Department of LaborCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969
- Lester Stacy v. The Aetna Casualty & Surety CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1973
- John P. Borel v. United States Casualty CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1956
- Giannone v. United States Steel Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1956
- Costner v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1981
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.