Legal Opinion
O'Toole v. Empire Motors, Inc.
Washington Supreme Court
Decided March 12, 1935No. 25276. En BancPublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHolcomb, J.
Appellant issued to the principal defendant, Empire Motors, Inc., an insurance policy which was in effect July, 1932. The parts of that policy material to this controversy read:
“The Mercer Casualty Company . . . hereby agrees:
“(1) To pay all sums which the assured shall become legally liable to pay, for (a) damages on account of bodily injuries . . . suffered by any person or persons not employed by the assured, and (b) . . . damages ... on account of damage to . . . property . . . resulting from an accident occurring while this policy is in force, by reason of the maintenance and operation…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Washington Gas Light Co. v. District of ColumbiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
- Guaranty Trust Co. v. Continental Life InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1930
- Stusser v. Mutual Union InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1923
- Hanson v. Blackwell Motor CompanyWashington Supreme Court · 1927
- Koontz v. General Casualty Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1931
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Jeffries v. General Casualty Co. of AmericaWashington Supreme Court · 1955
- Foreman v. JordanLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1961
- Compton v. EvansWashington Supreme Court · 1939
- Dixon v. Fiat-Roosevelt Motors, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1973
- L. J. Dowell, Inc. v. United Pacific Casualty InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1937
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.