Legal Opinion
Koontz v. General Casualty Co.
Washington Supreme Court
Decided April 10, 1931No. 22510. Department TwoPublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtFullerton, J.
On November 30, 1928, the General Casualty Company of America, the appellant herein, issued to the defendant, Tefft, a policy of insurance, insuring him, among other things, against liability for property damage he might cause to another while in the use of an automobile described in the policy. On January 28, 1929, Tefft, while driving the automobile on a public highway, collided with an automobile driven by the respondent, Koontz. In the collision the respondent’s automobile was damaged.
Tefft shortly thereafter, in compliance with the conditions of his policy, reported the accident to the…
2Cited by14 opinions
- Oregon Automobile Insurance v. SalzbergWashington Supreme Court · 1975
- Luntz v. SternOhio Supreme Court · 1939
- Eakle v. HayesWashington Supreme Court · 1936
- Burr v. LaneCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1974
- Atlantic Mutual Insurance Company, a Corporation v. Robert J. Cooney, Doing Business Under the Firm Name and Style of Allied Enterprises, and National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, Pa., a Corporation, National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, Pa., a Corporation v. Robert J. Cooney, Doing Business Under the Firm Name and Style of Allied Enterprises, Robert J. Cooney, Doing Business Under the Firm Name and Style of Allied Enterprises v. National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, Pa., a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1962
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.