Legal Opinion

Dixon v. Besco Engineering, Inc.

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Decided October 30, 1995No. 2406PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Howell, Chief Judge:

James Dixon, a former employee of Besco Engineering, Inc. (Besco), brought this action alleging Besco’s negligence as a bailee caused the theft of Dixon’s machinist tools. The judge entered a default against Besco because it failed to answer Dixon’s complaint until over seventy-five days after the extended time agreed upon by the parties. In the subsequent damages hearing, the circuit judge granted Dixon $25,060.00 actual damages based on the value of the lost tools and lost wages.

I. Default Judgment

Dixon’s summons and complaint were properly served on Besco’s registered…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Townes Associates, Ltd. v. City of GreenvilleSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1976
  2. Young Ex Rel. Estate of Young v. Tide Craft, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1978
  3. Noisette v. IsmailSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1991
  4. Hayes v. TrulockCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1988
  5. Matthews v. PorterSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1962

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Small v. Pioneer MacHinery, Inc.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 1997
  2. Austin v. Stokes-Craven Holding Corp.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2010
  3. Mellen v. LaneCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2008
  4. Sundown Operating Co. v. Intedge Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2009
  5. South Carolina Department of Transportation v. M & T Enterprises of Mt. Pleasant, LLC.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 2008

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API