Legal Opinion

Rogers v. Janzen

District Court, E.D. Louisiana

Decided March 23, 1989No. Civ. A. No. 87-4669PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER AND REASONS

ARCENEAUX, District Judge.

This matter comes before the Court on motions for summary judgment filed by each of three groups of defendants: 1.) William Bradford Janzen, Ph.D., William Bradford Janzen, Ph.D., a professional corporation, and National Union Fire Insurance Company (“Janzen”); 2.) Ralph Un-derwager, Ph.D., Institute for Psychological Therapies, and St. Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Company (“Underwager”); and 3.) Frank Gray, Jr. (“Gray”). Having thoroughly reviewed the record, the memoran-da of counsel, and the law, this Court has determined that it will abstain…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Younger v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Colorado River Water Conservation District v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Briscoe v. LaHueSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  4. Huffman v. Pursue, Ltd.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
  5. Moore v. SimsSupreme Court of the United States · 1979

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Marrogi v. HowardSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2002
  2. Rogers v. JanzenCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1989
  3. Rogers v. JanzenCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API