Rogers v. Janzen
District Court, E.D. Louisiana
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER AND REASONS
ARCENEAUX, District Judge.
This matter comes before the Court on motions for summary judgment filed by each of three groups of defendants: 1.) William Bradford Janzen, Ph.D., William Bradford Janzen, Ph.D., a professional corporation, and National Union Fire Insurance Company (“Janzen”); 2.) Ralph Un-derwager, Ph.D., Institute for Psychological Therapies, and St. Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Company (“Underwager”); and 3.) Frank Gray, Jr. (“Gray”). Having thoroughly reviewed the record, the memoran-da of counsel, and the law, this Court has determined that it will abstain…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Younger v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Colorado River Water Conservation District v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Briscoe v. LaHueSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Huffman v. Pursue, Ltd.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Moore v. SimsSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Marrogi v. HowardSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2002
- Rogers v. JanzenCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1989
- Rogers v. JanzenCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1989