Legal Opinion
Rogers v. Janzen
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Decided December 28, 1989No. 89-3254PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
891 F.2d 95
Sherri ROGERS, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
William Bradford JANZEN, Ph.D.; William Bradford Janzen, a
Professional Psychology Corporation; National Union Fire
Insurance Company of Pittsburgh; Ralph Underwager;
Institute for Psychological Therapies; St. Paul Fire and
Marine Insurance Company; and Frank Gray, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 89-3254.
United States Court of Appeals,
Fifth Circuit.
Dec. 28, 1989.
Richard Ducote and Erin L. Garriola, Richard Ducote & Associates, New Orleans, La., for plaintiff-appellant.
Charles T. Weigel, Jr., Michael S. Guillory, Debra Fischman Cottrell, and Frederick R.…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Phillips, Nizer, Benjamin, Krim & Ballon v. Lewis S. RosenstielCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1973
- Mabel Smith Crouch v. Parsons Thomas CrouchCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978
- Jacqueline Suzanne Agathe Jagiella, A/K/A Jacqueline Rigaux Jagiella v. Waclav James Constantine Jagiella, A/K/A Waclav J. JagiellaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
- Rykers v. AlfordCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1987
- J.D. Franks and Margaret Franks v. Van Smith, Etc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1983
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- United States v. BaileyDistrict Court, W.D. Texas · 1995
- Mauro v. MauroDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1991
- Begum v. MinerCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2000
- United States v. BaileyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1997