Legal Opinion

Mitchell v. Rice

Washington Supreme Court

Decided September 3, 1935No. 25479. Department OnePublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGeraghty, J.

This action was brought by the plaintiff as administrator of the estate of his adult son, Hampton H. Mitchell, to recover for the death of the son resulting from a collision between a motorcycle driven by him and an automobile driven by defendant Rice.

The plaintiff, alleging dependency upon the son, sued upon two causes of action; the first cause, based upon Rem. Rev. Stat., § 194 [P. C. § 8275], was for the injuries, pain, suffering and expense of the decedent prior to his death; the second, based upon Rem. Rev. Stat, §§183 and 183-1 [P. C. §§8259 and 8260], was for the financial loss…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Bortle v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1910
  2. Kanton v. KellyWashington Supreme Court · 1911
  3. Grant v. Libby, McNeill LibbyWashington Supreme Court · 1927
  4. Maddock v. McNivenWashington Supreme Court · 1926

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Beggs v. Department of Social & Health ServicesWashington Supreme Court · 2011
  2. Cook v. RaffertyWashington Supreme Court · 1939
  3. Ahrens v. AndersonWashington Supreme Court · 1936
  4. Armantrout v. CarlsonWashington Supreme Court · 2009
  5. Armantrout v. CarlsonWashington Supreme Court · 2009

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API