Legal Opinion

Armantrout v. Carlson

Washington Supreme Court

Decided September 10, 2009No. 81195-4PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMadsen, J.

¶1 — This case involves a wrongful death suit by the parents of an adult child against her medical care provider. We are asked to decide if the provision of services that have an economic value may be considered by the trier of fact when determining whether a parent was “dependent for support” on an adult child as required by RCW 4.20.020 to maintain an action for wrongful death. We now hold that the trier of fact may consider a parent’s financial dependence on these services.

FACTS

¶2 At the time of her death, Kristen Armantrout was 18 and living at home with her mother. She died of a…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Federal Communications Commission v. Pacifica FoundationSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. State v. ArmendarizWashington Supreme Court · 2007
  3. State v. ArmendarizWashington Supreme Court · 2007
  4. Garrison v. Washington State Nursing BoardWashington Supreme Court · 1976
  5. Philippides v. BernardWashington Supreme Court · 2004

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Beggs v. Department of Social & Health ServicesWashington Supreme Court · 2011
  2. State v. MitchellWashington Supreme Court · 2010
  3. Estate of Wasilchen v. GohrmanDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2012
  4. State v. MitchellWashington Supreme Court · 2010
  5. Beggs v. STATE, DEPT. OF SOCIAL & HEALTHWashington Supreme Court · 2011

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API