Legal Opinion

Grant v. Libby, McNeill Libby

Washington Supreme Court

Decided August 23, 1927No. 20667. Department TwoPublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHolcomb, J.

This is an action by her administra-trix, as personal representative of the deceased., Dorothy Grant, a minor, against Libby, McNeill & Libby, a corporation, E. 8. Lueth, electrical inspector of Yakima, and the American Surety Company, a corporation, the surety on his official bond, for damages for the death of the minor by reason of alleged negligence on the part of respondents.

At the close of the evidence for appellant, a motion for a nonsuit was made by respondents, upon the two grounds: That no negligence was shown on the part of any of respondents, and that no dependence was shown upon…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Duval v. HuntSupreme Court of Florida · 1894
  2. Bortle v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1910
  3. Houlihan v. Connecticut River RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1895
  4. Kanton v. KellyWashington Supreme Court · 1911

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Cook v. RaffertyWashington Supreme Court · 1939
  2. Mitchell v. RiceWashington Supreme Court · 1935
  3. State Bank of Sevier v. American Cement & Plaster Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1932
  4. Armantrout v. CarlsonWashington Supreme Court · 2009
  5. Armantrout v. CarlsonWashington Supreme Court · 2009

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API