Hartford Fire Ins. Co. v. Jordan
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. U. S. Webb, Attorney-General, and John H. Riordan, Deputy Attorney-General, for Appellants.
1Opinion of the Court
THE COURT.
A rehearing was granted in this ease for consideration of the sole question of the personal liability of defendant Frank C. Jordan, against whom, as an individual, judgment was given. This question did not receive the attention it merited, the mind of the court being led away from a consideration of its real importance by the fact that it was stipulated at the trial of the cause that no attempt would be made to enforce a personal judgment against Jordan, if in fact such a judgment was given. On rehearing it is pressed upon our attention with a force which cannot be combatted that…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Ex Parte YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Cary v. CurtisSupreme Court of the United States · 1845
- Nelson J. Elliott v. Samuel SwartwoutSupreme Court of the United States · 1836
- Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. O'ConnorSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
- Carew v. RutherfordMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1870
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Mutual Life Insurance v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
- County of Los Angeles v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
- Spencer v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
- Pacific Gas & Electric Co. v. RobertsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914
- Sheehan v. Board of Police CommissionersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.