Legal Opinion
Friedman v. Rayovac Corp.
District Court, W.D. Wisconsin
Decided May 30, 2003No. 02-C-0308-C, 02-C-325-C, 02-C-370-CPublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
CRABB, District Judge.
In this proposed class action, plaintiffs allege that defendants artificially inflated the price of defendant Rayovac Corporation’s stock by making false and misleading statements in violation of the Securities Act of 1933, 15 U.S.C. §§ 77a-77aa, and the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, 15 U.S.C. §§ 78a-78mm. Jurisdiction is present under 28 U.S.C. § 1331. In an opinion and order dated September 23, 2002, I granted plaintiffs’ motion to appoint Eli Friedman, Lawrence M. Cox, Carol A. LoGalbo and Harold C. Eck as the lead plaintiff group. On November 12,…
2Cases cited103 opinions
- Swierkiewicz v. Sorema N. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Landgraf v. USI Film ProductsSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Ernst & Ernst v. HochfelderSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Basic Inc. v. LevinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- TSC Industries, Inc. v. Northway, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
98 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- In Re WorldCom, Inc. Securities LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2003
- In Re FirstEnergy Corp. Securities LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2004
- DeKalb County Pension Fund v. Transocean Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2016
- In Re Alstom SA Securities LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2005
- Quaak v. Dexia, S.A.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2005
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.