Legal Opinion
Quaak v. Dexia, S.A.
District Court, D. Massachusetts
Decided February 9, 2005No. CIV.A.03-11566-PBSPublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
SARIS, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
Class plaintiffs bring claims for securities fraud against Dexia Bank Belgium (“Dexia”), the successor to Artesia Banking Corp., S.A. (“Artesia”), the former chief commercial banker for Lernout & Hauspie Speech Products N.V. (“L & H”). 1 Defendant has moved to dismiss, arguing that the claims are time-barred and that their allegations fail" to support a claim for primary liability under Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,15 U.S.C. § 78j(b), and Rule 10b-5 promulgated by the Securities and Exchange- Commission (SEC), 17…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Landgraf v. USI Film ProductsSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Bowen v. Georgetown University HospitalSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Central Bank of Denver, N. A. v. First Interstate Bank of Denver, N. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Valerie Watterson v. Eileen PageCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1993
- Lampf, Pleva, Lipkind, Prupis & Petigrow v. GilbertsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Regents of the University of California v. Credit Suisse First Boston (USA), Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2007
- In Re Parmalat Securities LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2005
- Simpson v. Aol Time Warner Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
- In Re Enron Corp. SecuritiesDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2006
- In Re Mutual Funds Investment LitigationDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2005
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.