Legal Opinion
Schloss v. Cincinnati Insurance
District Court, M.D. Alabama
Decided June 29, 1999No. Civ.A. 98-A-1083-NPublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
ALBRITTON, Chief Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
This case is before the court on cross motions for summary judgment. Defendants Pacific Indemnity (“Pacific”) 1 and The Cincinnati Insurance Company (“Cincinnati”) (collectively the “Defendants”) request summary judgment (Doc. # s 22 and 25, respectively), and Plaintiff B. Stephen Schloss (“Schloss”) requests that the court grant him a partial summary judgment on the issue of liability (Doc. # 28).
Count I of Schloss’ Complaint, as amended, requests a declaration that, pursuant to the homeowner’s insurance policies issued by the…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonald v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1992
- Grady Allen BARNES, Billy Blount, Et Al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. SOUTHWEST FOREST INDUSTRIES, INC., Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1987
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Fiess v. State Farm LloydsTexas Supreme Court · 2006
- Swire Pacific Holdings, Inc. v. Zurich Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 2003
- Swire Pacific Holdings Inc. v. Zurich InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2002
- Cooper v. American Family Mutual InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2002
- Arnold v. Cincinnati InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2004
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.