Legal Opinion

Fiess v. State Farm Lloyds

Texas Supreme Court

Decided August 31, 2006No. 04-1104PublishedCited by 339 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Brister

in which Chief Justice JEFFERSON, Justice HECHT, Justice WAINWRIGHT, Justice GREEN, Justice JOHNSON, and Justice WILLETT joined.

The question in this case is not whether insurers should provide mold coverage in Texas, a public policy question beyond our jurisdiction as a court. The question instead is whether the language in an insurance policy provides such coverage — no more and no less.

The rules for construing insurance policies have been around for a long time, long before this dispute arose. Those rules require us to construe a policy according to what it says, not what regulators or…

2Cases cited60 opinions

  1. Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. City of Keller v. WilsonTexas Supreme Court · 2005
  3. Patterson v. McLean Credit UnionSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. Christensen v. Harris CountySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  5. Gustafson v. Alloyd Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1995

55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by339 opinions

  1. TGS-NOPEC GEOPHYSICAL CO. v. CombsTexas Supreme Court · 2011
  2. Gilbert Texas Construction, L.P. v. Underwriters at Lloyd's LondonTexas Supreme Court · 2010
  3. Railroad Commission v. Texas Citizens for a Safe Future & Clean WaterTexas Supreme Court · 2011
  4. Uri, Inc. v. Kleberg Cnty.Texas Supreme Court · 2018
  5. State Farm Lloyds v. JohnsonTexas Supreme Court · 2009

334 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API