Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

People v. Limage

Criminal Court of the City of New York

Decided February 5, 2008PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Miriam Cyrulnik, J.

*396The defendant is charged with two counts of aggravated harassment in the second degree (Penal Law § 240.30 [1] [a], M).

The defendant moves to dismiss the charges against him, contending that they are facially insufficient, and that the statute is unconstitutional as applied in this prosecution. The People oppose.

Factual Background

The accusatory instrument alleges, in pertinent part, that on or about and between September 3, 2007 at 4:36 p.m. and September 4, 2007 at 9:05 a.m. at 397 East 49th Street, Brooklyn, N.Y.: “Deponent is informed by Suzette Davis…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Cohen v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. People v. AlejandroNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
  3. People v. CaseyNew York Court of Appeals · 2000
  4. People v. DumasNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
  5. People v. KoniecznyNew York Court of Appeals · 2004

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. People v. BehlinCriminal Court of the City of New York · 2008
  2. People v. BrodeurCriminal Court of the City of New York · 2013
  3. People v. RodriguezCriminal Court of the City of New York · 2008
  4. People v. ThompsonCriminal Court of the City of New York · 2010
  5. People v. EvansCriminal Court of the City of New York · 2008

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API