Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

People v. Thompson

Criminal Court of the City of New York

Decided May 12, 2010PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Robert D. Kalish, J.

Upon the submitted papers, the defendant’s motion to dismiss the underlying matter as facially insufficient is granted to the extent as follows:

Procedural History

In the instant action, the defendant is accused of violating Penal Law § 240.30 (1) (a) — aggravated harassment in the second degree (class A misdemeanor); Penal Law § 240.30 (1) (b) — aggravated harassment in the second degree (class A misdemeanor); Penal Law § 240.30 (2) — aggravated harassment in the second degree (class A misdemeanor); and Penal Law § 240.26 (1) — harassment in the second…

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. Virginia v. BlackSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
  2. People v. AlejandroNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
  3. People v. CaseyNew York Court of Appeals · 2000
  4. People v. JenningsNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
  5. People v. DumasNew York Court of Appeals · 1986

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. People v. BrodeurCriminal Court of the City of New York · 2013
  2. People v. Pierre-LouisNassau County District Court · 2011
  3. People v. CruzCriminal Court of the City of New York · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API