Legal Opinion

Arthur D. Jones & Co. v. Cunningham

Washington Supreme Court

Decided March 27, 1914No. 11452PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Spokane county, Sullivan, J., entered January 3, 1913, upon findings in favor of the plaintiff.

1Opinion of the Court

Pee Cueiam.

The respondent in his answering brief moved for a dismissal of this appeal, and for an affirmance of the judgment appealed from, on the ground of insufficiency of the appeal bond. When the case was called for hearing in this court, the appellant confessed the motion in so far as it asked for a dismissal of the appeal, but objected to an affirmance of the judgment, or a judgment against the sureties on the appeal bond.

The respondent insists on both branches of the motion, but we think the objection of the appellant well taken. This court has power to render a judgment of affirmance…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Hanna v. SavageWashington Supreme Court · 1894
  2. Allen & Powell v. CatlinWashington Supreme Court · 1894
  3. Grunewald v. West Coast Grocery Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1895
  4. Henry v. Great Northern Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1897
  5. Sears v. Seattle Consolidated Street Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1893

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Johnston v. Seattle Taxicab & Transfer Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1916
  2. Stone v. Brakes, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1933

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API