Legal Opinion

Sears v. Seattle Consolidated Street Railway Co.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided November 18, 1893No. 643PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from Superior Court, King County. Opinion on motion to modify judgment Upon supersedeas bond.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Hoyt, J.

The question of jurisdiction raised by the respondents has been substantially decided adversely to their contention in an opinion just filed in the case of Bell v. Waudby, ante, p. 203, and upon the authority of that case we must overrule such plea, and decide the motion on its merits.

At the time the first judgment was rendered in this court on motion of the respondents, it was so rendered upon the transcript of the bond which was then a part of the record, and, of course, was rendered against the appellant and the sureties named in such bond.…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. F. B. Williams Cypress Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1913
  2. Sears v. KilbourneWashington Supreme Court · 1902
  3. Arthur D. Jones & Co. v. CunninghamWashington Supreme Court · 1914

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API