Royston Distributors, Inc. v. Moore-McCormack Lines, Inc.
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
VAN DUSEN, District Judge.
These actions claim recovery under The Carriage of Goods by Sea Act, 46 U.S.C. § 1301ff., for damage to British-made automobiles while being transported in an uncrated condition on respondent’s ships from England to Philadelphia, Pa. The following excerpts from the statement of facts in respondent’s brief (Document 50) summarize the basic facts developed by the evidence at the trial:
“These admiralty cases, consolidated for the purposes of trial, were tried by this Court. The libelants, Royston Distributors, Inc. (Royston Distributors) and Imperial Car Distributors,…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- United States v. United Shoe MacHinery Corp.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1953
- The Schooner Catharine v. DickinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1855
- Illinois Central Railroad v. CrailSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
- Donald Feeley v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1964
- Lucille H. Burch v. Reading CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1957
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- S.C. Johnson & Son, Inc. v. Louisville & Nashville Railroad CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1983
- Interstate Steel Corporation v. SS" Crystal Gem"District Court, S.D. New York · 1970
- Richard Construction Co. v. Monongahela & Ohio Dredging Co.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1968
- Primrose v. Philadelphia Dressed Beef Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1965