Primrose v. Philadelphia Dressed Beef Co.
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
VAN DUSEN, District Judge.
This case is now before the court on Defendant’s Alternative Motion for Judgment Notwithstanding the Verdict under 50(b) or a New Trial (Document 22) filed after the jury had returned a verdict for plaintiff in the amount of $8,428.-23 in this action, based on alleged breach of warranty and, in the alternative, alleged negligence of defendant in supplying alleged unfit animal feed which is claimed to have caused the death of plaintiff’s minks.
The jury was entitled to find the following facts, which, except for the words in brackets, are quoted from pages 1-2 of…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Foley v. the Pittsburgh-Des Moines Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1949
- Neely v. Provident Life & Accident InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
- Yardley v. CuthbertsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1885
- Rozumailski v. Philadelphia Coca-Cola Bottling Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1928
- Jarnot v. Ford Motor Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.