Legal Opinion

Cecala v. Thorley

Court of Appeals of Utah

Decided November 18, 1988No. 880195-CAPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

JACKSON, Judge:

Ronnie Cecala appeals from a summary judgment against her granted to all respondents, claiming the trial court misinterpreted voting rights language in restrictive covenants applicable to Bloomington Ranches No. 4 Subdivision. The issue before us is whether those covenants provide for one vote per lot, as the trial court concluded, or one vote per owner when property owners elect the subdivision’s architectural committee. We affirm.

Johnson Land Company, a partnership comprised of three individuals, filed the covenants for this subdivision in 1968 and a plat which divided…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Kimball v. CampbellUtah Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Zions First National Bank, N.A. v. National American Title Insurance Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Buehner Block Co. v. UWC ASSOCIATESUtah Supreme Court · 1988
  4. Timmerman v. GabrielMontana Supreme Court · 1970
  5. Duffy v. Sunburst Farms East Mutual Water & Agricultural Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1979

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Canyon Meadows Home Owners Ass'n v. Wasatch CountyCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2001
  2. Rice v. COHOLANCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2010
  3. Sky View Financial, Inc. v. BellingerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1996
  4. Hudson v. Morrison Heights Baptist ChurchMississippi Supreme Court · 2001
  5. Johnnie Ruth Hudson v. Morrison Heights Baptist ChurchMississippi Supreme Court · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API