Legal Opinion

Hempstead Warehouse Corp. v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided July 9, 1951No. 49118PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WHITAKER, Judge.

Plaintiff sues the defendant on three grounds: first, it says the defendant threatened to take its property and thus for a period of time prevented a sale of it; second, that defendant flew its airplanes over its lands at a low level, which prevented it from using its property and which frightened away persons who might have been interested in purchasing it. The third claim has been abandoned.

Plaintiff admits that the threat to condemn one's property does not constitute a taking, as well it must; but it says that the Act referring plaintiff’s claim to this court acknowledged…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. United States v. CausbySupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  2. Danforth v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
  3. United States v. SponenbargerSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
  4. Causby v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1948
  5. Poinsett Lumber & Manufacturing Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1940

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Fifth Avenue Corp. v. WASHINGTON COUNTY, ETC.Oregon Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Georgia-Pacific Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1980
  3. NBH Land Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1978
  4. Cayon v. City of ChicopeeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1971
  5. Seneca Constitutional Rights Organization v. GeorgeDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 1972

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API