Poinsett Lumber & Manufacturing Co. v. United States
United States Court of Claims
1Opinion of the CourtLittletoN, Judge
The defendant demurs to the second amended petition filed herein on the ground that the facts set forth therein do not state a cause of action against the United States entitling plaintiffs to recover.
The essential facts alleged and set forth in the petition, so far as are necessary to a determination of the question raised by the demurrer, are that plaintiff, the Poinsett Company, is the owner of a tract of timberland situated in Cross County, Arkansas, comprising more than 21,000 acres of the value of $1,366,845, which, it is alleged, has been appropriated and taken by the defendant under…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Danforth v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- United States v. SponenbargerSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
3Cited by7 opinions
- Rank v. (Krug) United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1956
- Hempstead Warehouse Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1951
- Stueve Bros. Farms, LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2012
- Stueve Bros. Farms, LLC v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2013
- Creech v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1944
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.