Legal Opinion

Causby v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided January 5, 1948No. 46054PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WHITAKER, Judge.

In the foregoing findings of fact we have described the easement taken by the defendant as the right to fly its plane? through the airspace over plaintiffs’ property at altitudes between 83 feet and 365 feet above the surface of the ground. Eighty-three feet is the height above the ground of the safe glide angle, below which defendant’s airplanes did not claim the right to fly. Three hundred sixty-five feet is 300 feet above the tallest object on plain tiffs’ property. Three hundred feet is the minimum safe altitude fixed by the Civil Aeronautics Authority at which any type of…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Pumpelly v. Green Bay Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1872
  2. United States v. CressSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
  3. United States v. LynahSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
  4. Portsmouth Harbor Land & Hotel Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
  5. Peabody v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1913

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. R. J. Widen Company v. The United States and Commonwealth of Massachusetts, Third-PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1966
  2. Matson v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1959
  3. Harris v. United States. Thomas v. United States. Ellis v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1953
  4. Matson v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1959
  5. Berenholz v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1982

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API