Legal Opinion
Appeal of Peirce
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
Decided September 2, 1982No. 81-075PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBoiS, J.
The plaintiffs appeal from a decision of the State Board of Education (State board) denying their application to provide home education for six-year-old Justin Peirce. They claim that the State board made erroneous evidentiary findings and failed to enforce certain due process procedures. We affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand.
On May 1, 1980, the plaintiffs, Denise Peirce and Christopher Rice, filed an application, pursuant to RSA 193:3, with the Claremont School Board, seeking permission to provide home education for Denise’s son, Justin. The plaintiffs subsequently revised the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Appeal of Concord Natural Gas Corp.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1981
- Town of Nottingham v. HarveySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1980
- Appeal of Gas Service, Inc.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1981
- Appeal of the City of NashuaSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1981
- Appeal of the Town of GoffstownSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1981
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Care & Protection of CharlesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1987
- Appeal of BeyerSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1982
- Annicchiarico v. StateSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1992
- Appeal of Portsmouth Savings BankSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1983
- Appeal of Public Service Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1988
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.