Legal Opinion

State v. Busch

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided October 9, 1996No. Nos. 95-1683 and 95-1893PublishedCited by 56 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPfeifer, J.

We hold that a trial court has the discretion to sua sponte dismiss a criminal case over the objection of the prosecution where the complaining witness does not wish for the case to proceed.

We need look no further than Crim.R. 48(B) for authority for trial judges to dismiss criminal actions sua sponte. The rule reads:

“Dismissal by the court. If the court over objection of the state dismisses an indictment, information, or complaint, it shall state on the record its findings of fact and reasons for the dismissal.”

Crim.R. 48(B) recognizes by implication that trial judges may sua sponte dismiss…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State v. JenkinsOhio Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Royal Indemnity Co. v. J. C. Penney Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1986

3Cited by56 opinions

  1. Disciplinary Counsel v. GaulOhio Supreme Court · 2010
  2. State v. Congrove, 06ap-1129 (6-29-2007)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2007
  3. Swearingen v. Waste Technologies IndustriesOhio Court of Appeals · 1999
  4. State v. KilbargerOhio Court of Appeals · 2012
  5. State v. HuffmanCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2009

51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API