Legal Opinion
Mittal Steel Point Lisas Ltd. v. United States
United States Court of International Trade
Decided July 6, 2007No. Slip Op. 07-106; Court 02-00756PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Memorandum,
AQUILINO, Senior Judge.
Before this court are the January 16, 2007 Views of the U.S. International Trade Commission (“ITC”) 1 issued pursuant to the order of remand filed herein, 30 CIT -, Slip Op. 06-151 (Oct. 13, 2006), in conformity with the mandate of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (“CAFC”) that the commissioners
“make a specific causation determination and in that connection ... directly address' whether [other LTFV imports and/or fairly traded imports] would have replaced [Trinidad and Tobago’s] imports without any beneficial effect on domestic producers.”
Cari…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Briggs v. Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- American Spring Wire Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1984
- Himely v. RoseSupreme Court of the United States · 1809
- Gerald Metals, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1997
- Chaparral Steel Company v. The United States, and Norsk Jernverk A.S.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1990
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Mittal Steel Point Lisas Ltd. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2008
- Mittal Steel Point Lisas Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2010
- Mittal Steel Point Lisas Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2010
- Mittal Steel Point Lisas Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2010
- Mittal Steel Point Lisas Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2010
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.