Himely v. Rose
Supreme Court of the United States
THIS was án appeal Irom so much of the final séntence of the circuit court for the district óf South Carolina;-rendered upon the mandate from this court issued upon the reversal of the former sentence 0f that court, [see' ante, vol. 4. p. 292.) as affirmed the report of auditors appointed by the court “ to inquire and report whether any, and if any, what deductions are to be allowed for freight, insurance and other expenses ivhich would have been incurred by the owners in…
Read the full summary
THIS was án appeal Irom so much of the final séntence of the circuit court for the district óf South Carolina;-rendered upon the mandate from this court issued upon the reversal of the former sentence 0f that court, [see' ante, vol. 4. p. 292.) as affirmed the report of auditors appointed by the court “ to inquire and report whether any, and if any, what deductions are to be allowed for freight, insurance and other expenses ivhich would have been incurred by the owners in bringing the, cargo into the United States, ‘ and also to ascertain and report the interest to be paid by the claimant to…
1Opinion of the Court
Marshals,, Ch. J.
delivered'the opinion, of the court 43 follows :
A decree having been tormerly rendered in this cause, the cojurt is, now! to determine whether that decree has been executed according to its true intent and meaning.
That decree directed “ the cargo of the Sarah to he -stored to the original owners, subject tp those charges of freight, insurance and' other expenses which would haye been incurred by'them, in bringing the cargo into the United States.”
In carrying this decree into execution, an allowance has been made for freight,'and for expenses' incurred at the port of…
2Cited by97 opinions
- Briggs v. Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Johnson v. Cadillac Motor Car Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1919
- Robin L. Peoples v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2005
- Dodge v. GaylordIndiana Supreme Court · 1876
- In Re Washington & Georgetown RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
92 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.