Legal Opinion

Austro-Hungarian Consul v. G. A. Westphal

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided December 27, 1912No. Nos. 17,817—(161)PublishedCited by 27 opinions

Gr. A. Westphal was appointed administrator of the estate of Stanislaw Lis by the probate court for Hennepin county. The facts are stated at the beginning of the opinion. From the order of appointment Hugo Silvestri, imperial and royal Austro-Hungarian consul of Chicago, who appeared in the proceedings and objected to the appointment, appealed to the district court for that county.

Read the full summary

Gr. A. Westphal was appointed administrator of the estate of Stanislaw Lis by the probate court for Hennepin county. The facts are stated at the beginning of the opinion. From the order of appointment Hugo Silvestri, imperial and royal Austro-Hungarian consul of Chicago, who appeared in the proceedings and objected to the appointment, appealed to the district court for that county. The appeal was beard upon stipulated facts before Booth, J., who made findings and as conclusion of law affirmed the order of the probate court. From the judgment entered pursuant to the order for judgment, the…

1Opinion of the CourtPhilip E. Brown, J.

Stanislaw Lis, a native and citizen of Austria, died intestate on October 14, 1911, while residing in Hennepin county, Minnesota under circumstances giving bis next of kin a claim for damages for bis wrongful death; such next of kin being a widow and seven minor children, all citizens of Austria and never residents of tbe United States. Thereafter, on November 16, 1911, R. F. Bertch & Com*125pany, a corporation, petitioned the probate court of Hennepin county that letters of administration be issued upon the estate to Gr. A. Westphal, an attorney of Minneapolis, alleging substantially the above…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Rocca v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
  2. Hutchins v. St. Paul, Minneapolis & Manitoba Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1890
  3. Hildebrand v. KinneyIndiana Supreme Court · 1909
  4. Foot v. Great Northern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1900
  5. Becklin v. BecklinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1906

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. In Re the Estate of D'AdamoNew York Court of Appeals · 1914
  2. Miles's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1922
  3. Koenig v. JohnsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1945
  4. Wipperman Mercantile Co. v. JacobsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1916
  5. Vukmirovich v. NickolichSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1913

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API