Legal Opinion
In re Workers' Compensation Refund
District Court, D. Minnesota
Decided April 20, 1994No. Nos. 4-93-CV-515, 4-93-CV-516, 4-93-CV-555 and 4-93-CV-577PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
GUNN, District Judge.
This matter is before the Court on defendants’ motion for summary judgment on plaintiffs’ first amended complaint on the ground of the statute of limitations. As this Court ruled in its order dated December 15, 1993, 840 F.Supp. 90, this personal injury action is governed by Iowa’s two-year statute of limitations, Iowa Code § 614.1(2), as well as Iowa’s savings statute, Iowa Code § 614-10.
The savings statute provides that “[i]f after commencement of an action, the plaintiff, for any cause except negligence in its prosecution, fails therein, and a new…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Frysinger v. LeechOhio Supreme Court · 1987
- Kohlman v. FinkelsteinIndiana Court of Appeals · 1987
- Archer v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy R'y Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1885
- Harriet Beilke and Ralph Beilke v. Larry D. Droz, John E. Gegner and Beverly GegnerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1982
- Crawford v. HatcherDistrict Court, S.D. West Virginia · 1992
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Brady v. National Football LeagueDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2011
- In Re Workers'compensation RefundDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1994
- Worth v. HarringtonDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2023