Legal Opinion

In Re Workers'compensation Refund

District Court, D. Minnesota

Decided April 20, 1994No. 3:93-cv-00515Published

1Opinion of the Court

851 F.Supp. 1399 (1994)

In re WORKERS' COMPENSATION REFUND.

Nos. 4-93-CV-515, 4-93-CV-516, 4-93-CV-555 and 4-93-CV-577.

United States District Court, D. Minnesota, Fourth Division.

April 20, 1994.

James Thomas Martin, Dan Thomas Ryerson, Gislason Martin & Varpness, Edina, MN, for plaintiff.

Carolyn Page Ham, MN Atty. Gen., St. Paul, MN, Jocelyn Furtwangler Olson, MN Atty. Gen., St. Paul, MN, for John B. Lennes, Jr., James E. Ulland.

John F. Stone, Oppenheimer Wolff & Donnelly, Minneapolis, MN, for Workers' Compensation Reinsurance Ass'n.

Karl Craig Wildfang, Wood Robertson Foster, Jr., Anne Kathryn…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Ex Parte YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
  2. Edelman v. JordanSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. Hutto v. FinneySupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  4. Dataphase Systems, Inc. v. C L Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1981
  5. Hilton v. BraunskillSupreme Court of the United States · 1987

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API