Legal Opinion

United States v. an Article of Device Consisting of 1,217 Cardboard Boxes

District Court, W.D. Michigan

Decided April 2, 1985No. K 84-502PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ENSLEN, District Judge.

This action was filed on November 20, 1984 against a prosthetic shoulder ligament device, manufactured by Meadox Medicals, Inc., and distributed by Stryker Corporation. The device is used in the surgical repair of third-degree, and sometimes second-degree, acromioclavicular separation, a severe dislocation of the joint which stabilizes the clavical (collarbone) and scapula (shoulder blade). See, 1A Gordy & Gray, Attorneys’ Textbook of Medicine U 5.40-5.- 49 (1984). Such injuries often result from a fall with an outstretched arm, a force from above striking the…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. United States v. Diebold, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
  3. United States v. RutherfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  4. Dayco Corporation v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company, Dayco Corporation v. Firestone Tire & Rubber CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1975
  5. Bohn Aluminum & Brass Corporation v. Storm King CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1962

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. United States v. Universal Management Services, Inc., Corporation Natural Choice, Inc. Corporation, Doing Business as Natural Choice Products, Inc. Paul M. Monea, Individual Paul A. MoneaCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1999
  2. United States v. 22 Rectangular or Cylindrical Finished DevicesDistrict Court, D. Utah · 1989
  3. United States v. Universal Management Services, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1999
  4. United States v. Universal Management Services, Inc.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API