Legal Opinion

Johnson v. Buck

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 27, 1935No. Civ. 5277PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PAULSEN, J., pro tem.

This action to quiet title involves a strip of land approximately 15 inches in width and 891.84 feet in length, and was brought for the purpose of determining the location of a boundary line. Defendants appeal from a judgment rendered in favor of plaintiffs.

Respondents are the owners of the south half of the north half of lot 30 of Arcadia Acreage Tract in the city of Arcadia, and appellants are the owners of the northerly 77.25 feet of the south half of the same lot. Santa Anita Avenue, which runs north and south, forms the west boundary of the lot. The boundary in…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Sneed v. OsbornCalifornia Supreme Court · 1864
  2. Clapp v. ChurchillCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
  3. Dauberman v. GrantCalifornia Supreme Court · 1926
  4. Staniford v. TromblyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
  5. Janke v. McMahonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1913

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Johns v. ScobieCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
  2. Sorensen v. CostaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  3. Gilardi v. HallamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1981
  4. Townsend v. KoukolMontana Supreme Court · 1966
  5. Stephens v. HurlyMontana Supreme Court · 1977

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API