Legal Opinion

Putnam v. City of Watertown

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 17, 1995PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—Judgment unanimously reversed on the law without costs and petition dismissed. Memorandum: Respondent, City of Watertown (City), appeals from an order that granted the petition and directed the City to comply with General Municipal Law § 207-a (2) by paying petitioner the difference between his regular salary or wages and his performance of duty retirement allowance, retroactive to January 20, 1989. A judgment was subsequently entered granting the petition. Because the order appealed from is subsumed in the judgment, the proper appeal is from the judgment. In the exercise of our discretion,…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Hughes v. NussbaumerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
  2. Church of St. Paul & St. Andrew v. BarwickNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
  3. Mashnouk v. MilesNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
  4. Dozier v. New York CityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
  5. Ass'n of Surrogates v. BartlettNew York Court of Appeals · 1976

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Essex County v. ZagataNew York Court of Appeals · 1998
  2. Agoglia v. BenepeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
  3. Dembowski v. La PollaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
  4. One Niagara LLC v. City of Niagara FallsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
  5. Brzostek v. City of SyracuseAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API