Legal Opinion

Brzostek v. City of Syracuse

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided April 25, 1997PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—Judgment unanimously reversed on the law without costs and amended petition reinstated. Memorandum: Petitioner alleges that he suffered line-of-duty injuries that rendered him permanently disabled from his position as a firefighter for respondent City of Syracuse Fire Department. In 1994 petitioner sought benefits from the Fire Department pursuant to General Municipal Law § 207-a (1); that request was denied on the ground that petitioner had not "established through sufficient documentation that [his] injuries were incurred in the performance of [his] duties”. In 1995 petitioner applied to…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. MATTER OF COOK v. City of UticaNew York Court of Appeals · 1996
  2. Putnam v. City of WatertownAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Heck v. KeaneAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
  2. Brzostek v. City of SyracuseAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
  3. McGowan v. Fairview Fire DistrictNew York Supreme Court · 2006
  4. Viscomi v. Village of HerkimerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API