Dozier v. New York City
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Spatt, J.
In the continuing judicial exploration of the legality of drug testing, we hold that an applicant for a position as conductor with the New York City Transit Authority may be tested for drug usage provided that prior notice is afforded the applicant. In this case, sufficient prior notice was given, and the three petitioners, who held positions as conductors on probationary status, were properly discharged.
the facts:
In September 1981, the petitioners took a civil service examination for the position of conductor with the New York City Transit Authority (hereinafter…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Bell v. WolfishSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Williamson County Regional Planning Commission v. Hamilton Bank of Johnson CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- New Jersey v. T. L. O.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Watergate II Apartments v. Buffalo Sewer AuthorityNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
- Church of St. Paul & St. Andrew v. BarwickNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by39 opinions
- MATTER OF SCHULZ v. StateNew York Court of Appeals · 1995
- Legal Aid Society v. City of New YorkDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2000
- Rigel Corp. v. CutchallNebraska Supreme Court · 1994
- ROBINSON v. FAIRVIEW FELLOWSHIP HOME FOR SENIOR CITIZENS, INC.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2016
- Town of Oyster Bay v. KirklandAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.