Ass'n of Surrogates v. Bartlett
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtJones, J.
We hold that respondents may not be compelled to implement a decision of the Unified Court System Employment Relations Review Board that is outside the scope of the controversy before that board.
For over 20 years prior to 1972 the courts in the Appellate Division, First Department, had recessed over the Christmas-New Years holidays. The nonjudicial employees in the court system had never been required to charge the time off they thus enjoyed to their annual leave. In a departure from this past practice the Appellate Division canceled the court recess which would otherwise have been observed…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Matter of Burr v. . VoorhisNew York Court of Appeals · 1920
- Matter of Pruzan v. ValentineNew York Court of Appeals · 1940
3Cited by24 opinions
- Krimstock v. KellyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2002
- Krimstock v. KellyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2002
- Grisi v. ShainswitAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
- Putnam v. City of WatertownAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
- Harvey v. HynesNew York Supreme Court · 1997
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.