Legal Opinion

Performance Team Freight Systems, Inc. v. Aleman

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 2, 2015No. B259146PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

BOREN, P. J.

The individual respondents are truck drivers who entered into “Independent Contractor Agreements” with appellant. After the individual respondents filed wage claims against appellant, appellant petitioned to compel arbitration based on arbitration provisions in the agreements. The trial court denied the petition, ruling that the agreements were exempt from the Federal Arbitration Act (9 U.S.C. § 1 et seq.) (FAA) because the individual respondents were transportation workers and arbitration was not compelled under California law. The trial court also found that the…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. At&T Technologies, Inc. v. Communications WorkersSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Southland Corp. v. KeatingSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. Circuit City Stores, Inc. v. AdamsSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
  5. Perry v. ThomasSupreme Court of the United States · 1987

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Oliveira v. New Prime, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2017
  2. Garcia v. Pexco, LLCCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2017
  3. Esparza v. KS Indus., L.P., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017
  4. Clifford v. Quest Software Inc., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
  5. Subcontracting Concepts (CT), LLC v. De Melo, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API