Legal Opinion

Osgoodby v. Talmadge

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided November 6, 1933No. 12PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MANTON, Circuit Judge.

Appellee obtained a judgment below based upon the theory of a deceit practiced upon him when, in October, 1924, he entered into a contract with the corporate appellant for the purchase of land for development purposes in Florida. The contract called for the delivery of a deed of this property on payment of $15,000 to be made in installments, as deeds to lots were delivered. The appellee intended to develop the property for residential purposes, and required the delivery of deeds by the corporate appellant as he sold the property to his customers and as he paid certain…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Rogers v. Virginia-Carolina Chemical Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1906
  2. Harley & Lund Corporation v. Murray Rubber Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1929
  3. Church v. SwetlandCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1917
  4. Wright v. BarnardDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1917

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Curran v. VincentOhio Court of Appeals · 2007
  2. United States v. Newbury Mfg. Co.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1941
  3. Rothbart v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1956
  4. Seaboard Terminal & Refrigeration Co. v. DrosteCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1935
  5. Rothbart v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1956

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API