Christal v. Trescony
California Supreme Court
APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of Monterey County settling the accounts of trustees. N. A. Dorn, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtHarrison, J.
Albert Trescony by his last will and testament disposed of his estate to various devisees, and on April 3, 1894, at the close of the administration of his estate, a decree of distribution was made distributing the estate in accordance with the terms of the will. By this decree one-third of the estate was distributed to the respondents herein, as trustees, upon certain trusts expressed therein, for the appellants, who are two minor children of a deceased daughter of the testator; and the other two-thirds of the estate were distributed to other beneficiaries under the will. After the entry of…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Estate of HinckleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1881
- William Hill Co. v. LawlerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
- Daly v. PennieCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
3Cited by34 opinions
- Bacon v. BaconCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
- Loring v. Town of KingsleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
- Estate of GoldbergCalifornia Supreme Court · 1938
- Campbell-Kawannanakoa v. CampbellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
- Shattuck v. ShattuckArizona Supreme Court · 1948
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.