M & R Amusements Corp. v. Blair

ORDER

NORGLE, District Judge.

Before the court is the motion of Malcom Walter Blair (“defendant”) to depose Nicholas Esposito, attorney for the plaintiff, M & R Amusements Corporation (“M & R”) pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(a), (b).1 For the reasons set forth below, the court denies the motion.

FACTS

The amended complaint reveals that M & R owned and operated Evanston Theaters. M & R obtained coverage from Lloyd’s of *305London against “losses caused by the actual destruction, disappearance or wrongful abstraction of Money and Securities within or from the [Evanston Theaters]____”…