Legal Opinion
Umatilla County v. Porter
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided March 5, 1973PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtLangtry, J.
This appeal is in a Umatilla County tax foreclosure proceeding. The appealing defendants are persons who are record owners of certain tax delinquent property in the foreclosure proceeding and with whom there has been no recent contact. In an order entered in the proceeding the court appointed Dennis A. Haehler as attorney to represent these persons. This was done at the instance of the county’s attorney, and it is apparent the action was taken in order to remove any question of compliance with the Soldiers’ and Sailors’ Civil Relief Act of 1940, 50 App USCA § 520 (1968).
On behalf of those…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- King v. MullinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
- Hood River County v. DabneyOregon Supreme Court · 1967
- Longyear v. ToolanSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Knapp v. JOSEPHINE COUNTYOregon Supreme Court · 1951
- State Construction Corporation v. ScogginsOregon Supreme Court · 1971
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Township of Montville v. Block 69, Lot 10Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1977
- Grant County v. GuyerOregon Supreme Court · 1983
- QUAY DEV. v. Elegante Bldg. Corp.Supreme Court of Florida · 1981
- State v. BuenCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1973
- Township of Montville v. Block 69, Lot 10, Assessed to SpitzSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1977
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.