Legal Opinion

King v. Mullins

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided May 31, 1898No. 157PublishedCited by 88 opinions

ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOE THE DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA. The case is stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Harlan

the court.

This action of ejectment was brought to recover that part lying in the State of West Virginia of a tract of 500,000 acres of land patented by the Commonwealth of- Virginia in 1795 to Robert Morris, assignee of Wilson Cary Nicholas.

The pei’sons sued were very numerous, but, M. B. Mullins, Alexander McClintock and John McClintock having elected to sever in their defence from other defendants, the case was tried only as between them and the plaintiff King.

At the trial in the Circuit Court the plaintiff introduced in evidence the patent to Morris showing that, the lands therein…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Den Ex Dem. Murray v. Hoboken Land & Improvement Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1856
  2. Bell's Gap Railroad v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  3. Fairfax's v. Hunter's LesseeSupreme Court of the United States · 1813
  4. McClure v. MaitlandWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1884
  5. Bennett v. HunterSupreme Court of the United States · 1870

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by88 opinions

  1. Anderson v. RitterbuschSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
  2. Citizens' Telephone Co. of Grand Rapids v. FullerSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  3. Kentucky Union Co. v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1911
  4. Dickinson v. PorterSupreme Court of Iowa · 1948
  5. Florida Central & Peninsular Railroad v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of the United States · 1902

83 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API