Township of Montville v. Block 69, Lot 10, Assessed to Spitz
Supreme Court of New Jersey
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Pashman, J.
This ease involves the constitutionality of the notice procedures prescribed by the In Rem Tax Foreclosure Act, N. J. S. A. 54:5-104.29 et seq. The corporate landowner, which moves to reopen a final judgment of foreclosure by the municipality, argues that the act’s requirements of notice by publication and posting fall short of constitutionally guaranteed procedural due process. In doing so, it challenges the continued viability of this Court’s decision in City of Newark v. Yeskel, 5 N. J. 313 (1950), which upheld these procedures against…
2Cases cited50 opinions
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Bell v. BursonSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Township of Montville v. Block 69, Lot 10Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1977
- Dixie Portland Flour Mills, Inc. v. Dixie Feed & Seed Co.District Court, W.D. Tennessee · 1965