Legal Opinion
State v. Hermann
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided May 23, 1995No. 12328PublishedCited by 36 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHennessy, J.
The defendant, Scott Hermann, appeals from his conviction, following a jury trial, of sexual assault in the first degree in violation of General Statutes § 53a-70 (a) (2), risk of injury to a child in violation of General Statutes § 53-21, and interfering with an officer in violation of General Statutes § 53a-167a. The defendant claims that the trial court improperly (1) denied his motion for judgment of acquittal, (2) denied his motion to sever the trial on interfering with an officer from the trial on sexual assault and risk of injury, (3) failed to declare a mistrial for the state’s loss…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Arizona v. YoungbloodSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- State v. GoldingSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
- State v. EvansSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1973
- Colorado v. SpringSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by36 opinions
- In re Hector L.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1999
- Ghant v. CommissionerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2000
- Howerton v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2009
- State v. AlbertSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2000
- State v. RogersConnecticut Appellate Court · 1995
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.