Legal Opinion

Hall's Cleaners v. Wortham

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided November 16, 1992No. 92-559PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Tom Glaze, Justice.

The Arkansas Court of Appeals affirmed the Worker’s Compensation Commission’s affirmance of the administrative law judge’s ruling that appellee’s claim for initial benefits was filed within the two year statute of limitations mandated by Ark. Code Ann. § 1 l-9-702(a)(l) (1987). Hall’s Cleaners v. Wortham, 38 Ark. App. 86, 829 S.W.2d 424 (1992). We agree that appellee’s claim was timely, and affirm.

The statute of limitations issue was submitted to the Commission on the basis of a stipulated record, which essentially reflected that over a period of twelve years appellee…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Donaldson v. Calvert McBride Printing Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1950
  2. International Paper Co. v. Porter TubervilleSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1990
  3. Arkansas Louisiana Gas Co. v. GroomsCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1983
  4. St. Michael Hospital v. WrightSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1971
  5. Shepherd v. Easterling Construction Co.Court of Appeals of Arkansas · 1983

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing v. BakerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1999
  2. Deffenbaugh Industries & Travelers Insurance v. AngusSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1993
  3. Plante v. Tyson Foods, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1994
  4. Maloy v. Stuttgart Memorial HospitalSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1994
  5. Cottage Café, Inc. v. ColletteCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2006

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API