Legal Opinion

Plante v. Tyson Foods, Inc.

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided December 19, 1994No. 94-596PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Donald L. Corbin, Justice.

Petitioner, Tony Plante, appeals from a decision of the Arkansas Workers’ Compensation Commission holding his claim for additional compensation barred by the statute of limitations, Ark. Code Ann. § ll-9-702(b) (Supp. 1993). The Arkansas Court of Appeals affirmed the commission’s decision by a 3-1-2 vote. Plante v. Tyson Foods, Inc., 46 Ark. App. 22, 876 S.W.2d 273 (1994). We granted this petition for review of the decision of the court of appeals pursuant to Ark. Sup. Ct. R. l-2(f). We hold the claim for additional compensation was timely filed and therefore reverse…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Deffenbaugh Industries & Travelers Insurance v. AngusSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1993
  2. Reynolds Metal Company v. BrumleySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1956
  3. Ragon v. Great American Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1954
  4. Maloy v. Stuttgart Memorial HospitalSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1994
  5. Hall's Cleaners v. WorthamSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1992

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Gansky v. Hi-Tech EngineeringSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1996
  2. Golden v. Westark Community CollegeSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1998
  3. Arbaugh v. AG Processing, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 2005
  4. Kuhn v. Majestic HotelSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1996
  5. Swift-Eckrich, Inc. v. BrockCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1998

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API