Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Steward

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided October 10, 1985PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNolan, J.

The defendant asks us to hold that he was twice placed in jeopardy by being tried and found guilty after the judge had declared a mistrial because, on the second day of the first trial, only eleven jurors had appeared. We so hold, and we reverse the judgment of conviction.

The relevant events of the first trial are these. A jury of fourteen persons were empanelled on Friday, February 10, 1984, for the defendant’s trial on an indictment for robbery. The assistant district attorney made his opening and the first witness was called to testify. He was examined by the pros ecutor, cross-examined by…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Benton v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. Arizona v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. United States v. PerezSupreme Court of the United States · 1824
  4. Wade v. HunterSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  5. Illinois v. SomervilleSupreme Court of the United States · 1973

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. BrusgulisMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1986
  2. Commonwealth v. NormanMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1989
  3. Commonwealth v. JohnsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1998
  4. Marshall v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2012
  5. Commonwealth v. CassidyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1991

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API